Retire
How Long Will My Money Last?
A nest egg, a monthly withdrawal, and a return — and the year the line hits zero. Or doesn't: keep withdrawals under the interest and it never does.
A steady-return estimate. Real retirements meet real crashes — the order of returns matters as much as the average, which is exactly what a Monte Carlo tests and a straight line can't.
How it works
This is the question the famous "4% rule" was invented to answer. In 1994, financial planner William Bengen tested withdrawal rates against every 30-year stretch of US market history he had and found that starting at 4% of the portfolio (adjusted for inflation each year) had never exhausted a stock-and-bond mix. The 1998 Trinity study — three professors at Trinity University — ran a similar sweep across portfolio blends and reached broadly the same place, and "4%" became shorthand for a safe-ish starting withdrawal.
This calculator is simpler than either study, on purpose: a fixed monthly withdrawal, a constant return, one balance evolving month by month. The defaults hold a small discovery. Withdrawing $4,350 a month from $1,250,000 is a 4.2%-a-year pace — but at a 5% return, the pot earns about $5,208 a month, more than you're taking out. The balance rises, and the line never comes down. Drag the return slider to 3% and the same withdrawal starts eating principal; at 2%, the pot is gone in about 33 years. The gap between "grows forever" and "gone" is startlingly thin.
Here's why a steady-return line flatters you: real markets pay their average unevenly, and the order matters. Two retirements with identical average returns can end decades apart if one meets a crash in year two — every withdrawal during the downturn sells more of the portfolio at low prices, and the damage compounds. That's sequence-of-returns risk, this page can't model it, and it's exactly what ClariFi's Retirement Lab is for: it stress-tests this same question against 5,000 simulated market histories built on data back to 1928, and reports a success probability — not a single line that was never going to happen.
The formula
each month: balance = balance × (1 + r/12) − W
stop when balance ≤ 0, or after 40 years
never depletes when W ≤ balance × r/12 ← withdrawing under the interest
Example: $1,250,000 at 5%/yr earns ≈$5,208/mo
a $4,350/mo withdrawal never touches principal by this math
Honest assumptions
- The return arrives smoothly, every month, forever — no crashes, no recoveries, no sequence risk. Real retirements get none of that courtesy.
- The withdrawal never changes. There's no inflation adjustment — if you want one, treat the return slider as a real (after-inflation) return and the withdrawal as today's dollars.
- No taxes, no fund fees, no advisor fees. All of them make the money last less long than this page says.
- The chart stops at 40 years; "40+" means the money outlived the window, not that it's infinite.
- This page does arithmetic. It doesn't know your life — it's a starting point, not a plan, and not advice.
Questions people ask
Is the 4% rule still safe?
It's contested, honestly. Bengen himself later nudged his answer up toward 4.5% with more asset classes; other researchers argue lower — closer to 3.5% — for retirements longer than 30 years or starting when markets are expensive. The truthful summary: 4% is a well-researched starting point for a 30-year retirement, not a law of nature, and the longer your retirement, the more the assumptions matter.
What return should I assume in retirement?
Lower than in your accumulation years, usually — most retirees hold a blend of stocks and bonds rather than all stocks, and a blended portfolio has a lower expected return. Trying the slider across 3–5% is more informative than any single number, and if you're thinking in today's dollars, remember to use an after-inflation figure. The steadiness is the bigger fiction than the level.
What's sequence-of-returns risk?
The risk that the order of returns hurts you even when the average doesn't. A crash early in retirement forces you to sell more shares at depressed prices to fund the same withdrawal, so there's less left to ride the recovery — while the same crash in year twenty barely matters. It's the main reason a steady-return calculator like this one is a floor for understanding, not a plan.
What does a 98% success probability mean?
It means that in a simulation of thousands of possible market histories — ClariFi runs 5,000, built on data back to 1928 — the money lasted through retirement in 98% of them. Instead of one line drawn with average returns, you get a distribution of outcomes including the ugly ones, which is a far more honest way to hold a question this important.
Related calculators
ClariFi makes tools, not advice. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or sign anything.
In the app
ClariFi runs this math on your real accounts.
Connect your bank once and the numbers on this page compute themselves — live, private, every day. Free in TestFlight early access.
Get early accessiPhone only for now, iOS 17+. Tools, not advice.